VideoBar

Este contenido todavía no está preparado para las conexiones cifradas.

sábado, 12 de agosto de 2017

¿Cómo eliminar la deuda de los Estados?

Los Estados tienen deudas con bancos privados, porque a nadie se le ha ocurrido expropiar a toda la banca y que el Estado sea el Banco. No hay mejor forma de que los políticos fueran sensatos que con una democracia de verdad, con separación de poderes.

Lógicamente el banco público debería ser llevado por empleados públicos siguiendo las políticas monetarias del ministro de economía. 

Así no habría deudas, porque el Estado controlaría el dinero emitido, y podría ajustar la masa monetaria directamente sin los caros intermediarios que tenemos que son los que ejercen el poder real, los banksters. 

Manejando el Estado la política monetaria, y sin existir bancos privados, la tendencia sería a que: 

* Los políticos fueran sensatos. Con la separación de poderes real en una democracia de facto, la política monetaria sería la del Estado, no la de banqueros internacionales con intereses particulares. 

* La creación de dinero sería no para maximizar beneficios a un grupo elitista, sino para coordinar las políticas de obtención de riqueza y capitalización de la economía productiva a todas las capas sociales, sin recurrir a chupasangres que únicamente se lucran de los ciudadanos, con el pago de intereses de las deudas contraídas por los Estados que pagan los ciudadanos mediante impuestos confiscatorios. 

* Si el sistema se exportase a nivel mundial, todos los bancos de todos los estados estarían coordinados para lograr una moneda única fiduciaria, para de esta forma tener valor intrínseco y cada Estado hacer una confiscación de todos los metales preciosos (oro, platino, plata,...) de tal forma que los banqueros NUNCA pudieran recuperar el poder haciendo juegos malabares para intentar derrumbar un sistema que beneficiaría al ciudadano en general, en detrimento de una élite endiosada y avariciosa que solo sueña con dominar el mundo pervirtiendo a los políticos. 

* El Estado privatizaría todas las empresas que pudiese, pero el control estatal de la moneda sería el garante de la libertad del ciudadano frente a los banksters. 

* Todo el dinero fiduciario en una moneda global entre todos los estados garantizarían flujos de intercambio de factores de producción de tal forma que en poco tiempo, los costes salariales tenderían a igualarse y la multiplicación exponencial de las empresas sería una realidad, fuera de las manos conspirativas de los banqueros oligárquicos. 

Esto no es una utopía, es la única forma de reconducir la economía mundial. 

¡Abajo los banqueros privados!. Si es necesario, unamos nuestras fuerzas para que se hundan en la miseria para crear el sistema que va en contra de sus intentos de nuevo orden mundial nazicomunista, que es lo que intentan conseguir con sus crisis pactadas desde el tipo de interés amañado de sus putrefactas bancas centrales. 


martes, 11 de julio de 2017

Análisis del desempleo en España. Varias razones.



El nivel de desempleo en España es todavía muy elevado después de llevar legislatura y media con un gobierno del PP que se suponía iba a tomar medidas para corregir los despropósitos causados por el anterior gobierno socialista. Vemos como la sangría del desempleo se sitúa aún en niveles estratosféricos, como corresponde a una república bananera de 2º nivel, lejos de aquel pletórico alegato de "ser la Champion League de la Economía Mundial" pronunciado por ZP cual sinsorgo avezado en decir tonterías solemnes.


Pincha en la imagen para verla bien.

Estadística referida al 4º trimestre de 2016, dado que algunos países en 1º trimestre de 2017, no aparecen.

España tiene un problema serio y el gobierno pepero no ha conseguido nada más que engañar a los incautos con estadísticas fútiles y el arte del birlibirloque, aplicar la magia de números desordenados que les eran útiles para mostrar a la ciudadanía la mentira camuflada de la estadística manipulable, mientras muchos políticos de este partido se repartían el botín de los españoles al más puro estilo felipista de los años '80 y la escandalosa corrupción de aquellos tiempos. Lo que se ha producido es una demencial artimaña en los poderes económicos oligárquicos estatales (fundamentalmente bancos y las distribuidoras eléctricas) que han tomado el país para forrarse y sanear sus cuentas para enriquecerse a costa de empobrecer al ciudadano medio. 

Primer gran hándicap a mejorar: los elevados costes energéticos.

Declaraciones como la del ex-ministro Soria alegando que "las grandes compañías eléctricas venían a su despacho con el Real Decreto para firmarlo el gobierno" solo demuestra que en este país padecemos de políticos incompetentes, mentirosos, corruptos, evasores de impuestos y responsables de la situación actual del país,  pues además muestra la incongruencia de un ministro que firmó el decreto del "impuesto al sol" sobre el autoconsumo eléctrico.

España tiene interconexiones eléctricas con Francia, Marruecos (acuerdo renovado en 2015) y Portugal. De haber desarrollado más las energías renovables en parques solares fotovoltaicos y aerogeneradores, siguiendo la agenda 20/20/20 de la UE en materia de incentivación de renovables, España hubiera ganado mucho dinero por exportación de energía eléctrica.

Además, el autoconsumo es algo que debería potenciarse siempre, pero nunca cobrarse por disponer de energía del sol para consumo propio y a la hora de verter a la red, se debería cobrar un peaje de ATR (acceso terceros a la red) para establecer un balance neto (descuento de la factura entre lo que se ha gastado de la red y el importe de aportación sobrante). Lo único que debería cuidar un gobierno en su legislación es que no fuese superior la aportación a la red que el gasto eléctrico pues entonces se podría poner en quiebra la red de REE y la distribución si muchos particulares y empresas proceden a obtener ingresos de la red, superior a sus gastos. Lo que no es entendible es pagar un impuesto por usar placas fotovoltaicas para generación eléctrica particular sin ceder energía a la red. Eso es aberrante, delirante y denunciable. En este país sucede.

En la era ZP se fomentó la burbuja de las fotovoltaicas prometiendo que dicho sistema podría verter energía en la red pagando dinero por ello. De la legislación anterior se entendía que cualquier particular podría ceder a la red energía y se pagaría sin asumir costes ni establecer el balance neto. Un huerto solar no gastaba la electricidad captada, solo se beneficiaba de engancharse a la red y obtener beneficio vendiendo su energía. Bien, eso a efectos legales, debería también haberse visto como inviable, sencillamente porque las compañías distribuidoras y la REE tienen un negocio de distribución y si alguien genera por su cuenta y usa sus redes están utilizando una propiedad privada para obtener dinero, y estos usuarios no contribuyen a los gastos de mantenimiento, infraestructuras, averías, repuestos, etc. de dicha red, por lo que era también algo no posible. Muchísima gente con este marco legal se embarcó a comprar o alquilar huertos o parques solares con unas rentabilidades supuestas hipotéticamente de acuerdo a aquella legislación y luego esas inversiones fueron un fiasco cuando se vio que el sistema planteado era totalmente inviable por lo aducido anteriormente.

Incentivar las energías renovables, decaídas con el gobierno pepero (no es ni lo de antes ni lo de ahora), tendría ventajas en exportación de energía si se hubiera alcanzado el nivel de energías renovables que tiene un país como Alemania, el cual cuenta con muchísimas menos horas de sol. Otra de las ganancias hubiera sido la bajada en el coste del mercado eléctrico tanto en el mercado diario-intradiario (OMIE) como el mercado de derivados a plazo (OMIP), dado que las fuentes de energía renovable entran en el sistema siempre a cero euros y no la encarecen, por lo que un mix abundante de energía renovable en los mercados eléctricos tendería a hacer descender el precio del coste de la energía eléctrica. Indudablemente esto es algo que va en contra de las compañías eléctricas, sobre todo las que son distribuidoras, pero hay que reconocer que tal como está la situación de crisis en muchas industrias, el coste tan elevado de la energía (también el gas) es motivo para la menor competencia en los mercados internacionales y sobre todo para la desaparición de muchas pymes y pequeños empresarios, aparte de suponer un coste desorbitado para los ciudadanos en general.

¿Qué haría un gobierno responsable?
  • Auditar las cuentas de ingresos tanto de REE como de las distribuidoras en todos sus conceptos no liberalizados (precio de potencia, parte del precio de energía de ATR, capacidad, restricciones técnicas y pagos complementarios, costes financieros, coeficiente de pérdidas, impuesto eléctrico, impuesto municipal, ...). Muchos de estos precios están camuflados en la factura y no aparecen, pero existen. Los ingresos son fáciles de calcular teniendo en cuenta los diferentes tipos de facturas y los clientes. Tanto REE como las distribuidoras podrán hacer los listados de clientes con los precios y sus tarifas.
  • Una vez obtenido los ingresos, se analizarían los gastos tanto de la red primaria (REE) como la de distribución, en todos los aspectos, durante un año. De esta forma, tendríamos la cuenta clave: INGRESOS - GASTOS.
  • Cuando se tuviese ese dato (año tras año), se sabría el porcentaje superior de ingresos sobre gastos. Bajo esta premisa se debería hacer un RD del gobierno en el cual se fijaran las tarifas de ATR en los conceptos anteriores armonizadas a ese porcentaje. Se podría barajar un porcentaje como objetivo para tener las compañías margen de maniobra para realizar sus funciones en la red general y la distribución y estimar el beneficio tras gastos e impuestos. Un beneficio del 25 % anual entiendo que sería lo normal en la industria. Estoy seguro, sin saberlo, que los beneficios porcentuales de las distribuidoras y REE superan varios centenares porcentuales de beneficio. De esta forma se revisarían todas las tarifas fijadas en esos conceptos y se daría una bajada de todos los conceptos enumerados arriba, siempre con correcciones anuales. Así se reducirían los importes fijados por el gobierno de una forma inteligente y no como se hace ahora para esquilmar a empresas y ciudadanos. Y es que tenemos un mercado libre eléctrico, que de libre tiene poco, pues está fijado por un oligopolio donde concurren hasta más de 500 pequeñas comercializadoras que no tienen poder de variar los precios frente a las 3 grandes distribuidoras de 1ª fila, que también son comercializadoras.


Gobiernos tecnocráticos, ¿cómo?


En la Antigua Grecia, hace 2.700 años, existía la Democracia. Atenas es la polis griega más famosa por mantener ese sistema durante siglos.


En Grecia nadie votaba, ni había elecciones, ni oraban los atenienses ante la multitud para preparar un programa político. La democracia actual representativa de partidos surge en la Revolución Francesa con la existencia de dos partidos, los jacobinos (revolucionarios) y los girondinos (moderados). En Grecia no existían partidos políticos, y lo que es importante, no todo el mundo podía presentarse a político (incapaces, incultos, etc.). Solo los ciudadanos varones adultos que tuviesen capacidad podían ser elegidos (entre un 10 % de la población), excluidos los esclavos y los extranjeros establecidos, los matecos). El método de elección de los gobernantes era por sorteo. 



Sistema de sorteo de candidatos a políticos en Grecia. Cada surco representaba un candidato y era elegido como se hace en la lotería hoy en día.

Los gobiernos actuales en España se basan en partidos políticos subvencionados por el Estado. Todos los partidos "antiguos" ofrecen una barrera de entrada a otros partidos, dado que, al haber surgido después sufren de la menor dotación de fondos públicos para campañas, menores espacios electorales en medios de masas.

Los partidos políticos se han convertido en verdaderos centros de poder de gente ni habilitada ni capacitada, como en estos años de "democracia" hemos podido observar. Es vergonzoso haber padecido en España ministros que eran electricistas, ministras que balbucean vocablos como "miembros o miembras" y presidentes de gobierno, como Rajoy, que fueron puestos por el dedazo del anterior presidente del partido, Aznar. Los partidos políticos crean redes clientelares en las cuales enchufan a muchos parientes y allegados. Son máquinas de producir corrupción por la propia esencia del partido: "si eres de los nuestros, te posicionaremos". Además, por mucho que hablen de nuestra "amada" Constitución, en España no existe la ley igual para todos y mientas un pobre hombre es detenido por robar una barra de pan para comer, sinvergüenzas de todo pelaje político e ideológico usan sus cargos para practicar todo tipo de actos delictivos, contando conque la justicia les favorece, dado que están aforados y les juzgan tribunales de justicia, hechos a su medida con el pacto colusorio entre jueces y políticos, al no existir independencia judicial real. La connivencia entre el poder político y el poder judicial, aunque no siempre, es algo que sabe la opinión pública desde hace tiempo y es desastroso para los intereses de la ciudadanía en general.

Para cortar este sistema corrupto, que de democracia no tiene nada, debería establecerse un sistema que frenara la corrupción y pusiera en el poder a la gente más preparada, el gobierno de los más aptos (tecnocracia).

El sistema sería muy fácil. Redactar otra constitución y llevar a cabo estas proposiciones, donde:

  • Se desmantelaran las autonomías pues solo suponen un sobrecoste al ciudadano y el Estado puede funcionar perfectamente sin estos entes administrativos y volver al status quo de una nación sola. España es España y los separatismos actuales son el resultado de una dejadez de los gobiernos en materia de unidad de todos los españoles.
  • Ningún juez sería elegido por ningún órgano político. Serían elegidos por sorteo o bien por carrera profesional, por mérito. Separación de poderes real.
  • Los políticos se apuntarían a una Junta Evaluadora de Políticos quien dictaminaría si el candidato es apto o no apto, de acuerdo a un reglamento sobre las aptitudes y experiencias de los candidatos que deberían ser bien definidas para representar al ciudadano. Dentro de esos requerimientos existirían los "grados" de político de administración local, de político de diputación provincial y de político de administración estatal, habiéndose suprimido todas las autonomías por ley dentro de la nueva Constitución. De acuerdo al número de candidatos aptos, se haría un sorteo para ocupar las plazas en las 3 administraciones antedichas.
  • Los políticos sorteados tendrían dos ingredientes fundamentales que los distinguirían de los políticos de partidos:
        a) Todos los políticos que saldrían sorteados no lo harían por trepar en ningún partido sino por el reconocimiento de un Tribunal Imparcial de evaluación de las habilidades y capacidades propias de todos los aptos para ser políticos. Es decir, todos los políticos pasarían por la prueba de "valer" o "no valer". Hoy en día para llegar a ser político vale cualquiera que sea un lameculos de los políticos del partido, no existe la meritocracia, sino la hipocresía.

           b) No rendirían cuentas al partido sino a España. No tendrían interés particular de grupo, pues a pesar de encabezar la presidencia de un país, sus ministros hasta el momento de llegar al poder, serían desconocidos entre ellos. Esto es muy sano para una democracia donde las amistades peligrosas de larga trayectoria en partidos hacen vincular demasiados intereses particulares que hacen de nuestros representantes políticos meros muñecos tendentes a la corrupción y a gobernar para un grupo de personas y no para el pueblo.

  • El gobierno se formaría con el presidente, que sería elegido como todos por sorteo, y formaría gobierno con los ministros competentes en cada ramo, de acuerdo a la cantera de candidatos de la Junta Evaluadora de Políticos. La oposición estaría formada por otro grupo de elegidos, con la peculiaridad que se haría de forma responsable y no como se ejercita ahora, con cohesión de grupo, muchas veces, haciéndose de forma irresponsable. De esta forma, cada diputado en el Congreso podría votar de acuerdo a su libertad política y no a los dictámenes del partido, consiguiéndose una representación no interesada en "grupitos de poder", sino en hacer la noble empresa de ejercer como político para España.
  • La ventaja es clara: al no saberse quién es el presidente del gobierno de la nación o el alcalde del pueblo, no existirían a priori pactos de acuerdo entre empresas entrelazadas tradicionalmente a los partidos políticos que hacen que muchos proyectos y obras se realicen, no con la máxima de la mayor calidad y el mínimo precio, sino con un sobrecoste extra por el amiguismo que al final, paga el pueblo con la venia del resto de políticos de otras formaciones que son cómplices con la dicha de "hoy por ti y mañana por mí". 
  • El sistema debería permitir que el ciudadano renovara la confianza de los políticos cada 6 meses, pudiendo fácilmente hacerse mediante una votación a través de internet aprobando o reprobando la gestión, tanto del alcalde, del presidente del gobierno, como del diputado general. De esta forma se consigue que el político esté sometido continuamente al escrutinio y supervisión de los ciudadanos de España para, en caso de realizar desviaciones graves de una política sensata, pueda cambiarse a dicha persona e incluso a varias de su gobierno.
  • Desaparecerían las ideologías políticas. Un político se debe al pueblo y por lo tanto debe favorecer a todos los ciudadanos, a los ricos, a las clases medias y a las clases trabajadoras. Las ideologías políticas son entelequías maquiavélicas que llevan desde hace 2 - 3 siglos engañando a la población. La izquierda y la derecha son argumentos de confrontación para ganar electorado, pero como bien sabemos en España, da igual quien gobierne, que con esta falsa democracia de pandereta, solo están para sus propios beneficios y bienestar y la de sus amos, los banqueros y los oligarcas.
  • La política monetaria es asunto de cada Estado y no de iluminados endiosados pretenciosos con delirios de dominación mundial como hacen ver los heredados de las castas financieras en sus acciones desde hace tiempo. Por tanto, el Estado debe controlar su propio dinero, expropiando a los bancos de su poder, primero eliminando las bancas centrales, que son órganos de control obscurantista para conducir a los estados a deuda imparable y empobrecimiento del ciudadano en general con tipos de interés tasados para conducir a ciclos de auge-recesión. Y por último, expropiar a toda la banca y que solo haya un banco, el banco del Estado, donde los ciudadanos tengan respaldo a través de un cuerpo de empleados públicos tecnócratas y no de políticos manirrotos como sucedió con las Cajas de Ahorros. Una vez conseguido esto, la deuda pública será saldada a cero, y todos gozaremos de la garantía de que el Estado controla el dinero y tiene mecanismos, no para cargar impuestos producto de los intereses de la banca que es la prestataria del Estado, sino que tendrá la capacidad para autocorregir desequilibrios macro, como inflación y nivel de crecimiento. El Estado debe tener la potestad de manejar su política monetaria y no tenerla personas interesadas en obtener lucro a costa de hundir países, fomentar guerras o desplazar producciones a otros países con costes esclavistas. El Estado es la ley y ningún plutócrata financiero va a estar por encima de la ley, o al menos, así debería serlo. Las crisis continuas del sistema capitalista son producto del engaño de los grandes banqueros internacionales que han pervertido la esencia del capitalismo haciendo del dinero-deuda la mayor fuente de ingresos, junto con el desprestigio del Estado-Nación, para llevarnos a un Nuevo Orden Mundial nazicomunista, que es lo que pretenden desde sus poltronas del poder en la sombra. Si todas las naciones de la Tierra se pusieran de acuerdo, una divisa mundial apoyada por bancos públicos estatales vendría a consolidar la recuperación económica en poco tiempo. Al desaparecer la deuda de los países, los grandes banqueros reconvertidos en empresarios se deberían entregar en realizar inversiones en empresas en lugar de tener tantos activos podridos financieros fruto de la especulación. 

Funcionarios y enchufados varios.

España es un país que tiene DEMASIADOS FUNCIONARIOS. Y lo peor no es eso. España tiene demasiados funcionarios que, ni son de carrera, ni han hecho una oposición en la vida. Son "personal laboral" e "interinos" que accedieron al trabajo con total probabilidad por amiguismo político/sindical. 

A los funcionarios y a sus sucedáneos, les pagamos su nómina la gente que trabajamos para una empresa o por nuestra cuenta. El sistema de elegir funcionarios no es el mejor del mundo y eso es conocido frente a otros países. Muchos retienen textos y exhiben sus habilidades memorísticas, pero un funcionario lo que tiene es que razonar y emplear otras cualidades.

El sistema de obtención de un concurso - oposición trae una trampa consigo y es que si existen personas enchufadas que están trabajando desde hace tiempo, poseen puntos por antigüedad, cosa que la mayoría de aspirantes no tienen.

Además, un funcionario público no debería tener el puesto para toda la vida, sencillamente porque el Estado pudiera tener menores necesidades de personal en el futuro y entonces esos funcionarios estarían sobredimensionando el trabajo a realizar suponiendo un coste al erario y al contribuyente. Deberían existir empleados públicos con contrato, que pudieran ser fijos, pero con derecho a rescisión de contrato. Y se deberían suprimir los puestos "de carrera" con exámenes de concurso - oposición. ¿Qué ocurre si un funcionario sencillamente no trabaja bien o no le da la gana de trabajar e incluso riñe con compañeros para que le aparten y esté tocándose los coj... (conozco desgraciadamente algún caso)?

En definitiva, sería necesario reestructurar la administración, hacerla más pequeña, menos burocrática, más eficiente y con menos coste al Estado, que somos todos los que pagamos a los funcionarios públicos y personal enchufado por los políticos en altos cargos.

Ahora vaya arriba del todo y vuelva a hojear la tasa de paro de España. ¿Comprende por qué somos diferentes? Tenemos 3 veces más desempleo que la media de países de la OCDE (que integra ¡35 países!).  España necesita cambiar y el sistema de partidos políticos actuales no lo va a lograr. Se necesita un cambio revolucionario como el que ofrezco yo en esta entrada para encauzar España por la vía de la recuperación y en lugar de aumentar los impuestos a los sufridos españoles, lo que se debería hacer es disminuir el pelotón de enchufados varios y "funcionarios" que ni funcionan ni se ganan, muchas veces, su trabajo.

Hace 2.700 años en Atenas pusieron una Democracia de verdad para que no llegasen tiranos y no gobernaran solo para unos cuantos. ¿Por qué no se puede hacer en el siglo XXI en España y evitamos esta sangría de desempleo que es una auténtica vergüenza para los españoles de bien?


martes, 6 de junio de 2017

El Nuevo Orden Mundial se derrumba...

La estrategia de los banqueros internacionales de desviarse de la verdadera esencia del capitalismo (producir bienes y servicios) para intentar tener cada vez mayor poder a través de las bancas centrales y desmoronar el Estado del Bienestar alcanzado en Occidente, mediante su funesta intromisión controlando la política monetaria, va a llegar a su fin.

Los banksters no han contado conque cada vez más la población va despertando de las mentiras que cuentan los medios oficiales comprados y que el mundo no necesita guerras para mermar a la población.

También debemos darnos cuenta que los banqueros apoyan a todas las ideologías y políticos dándoles igual porque saben que con su dinero, es fácil corromper a la mayoría de ellos.

El último ejemplo lo tenemos en la banca de inversión "vampira" Goldman Sachs, que ha comprado bonos de Venezuela por dos razones:

  • Tener la posibilidad de hacer de Venezuela un país esclavo de deuda perpetua, pues no hay peor cosa para un alcohólico que suministrarle mayor cantidad de alcohol. Un Estado fallido como es la República Bolivariana de Venezuela únicamente debería cambiar de presidente para instalar un gobierno democrático, que respete los derechos humanos y que no hunda a todas las clases sociales con una manipulación total de los medios fácticos.

  • Conseguir una rentabilidad del bono (que cumple en pocos años) desmesurada, como banco de rapiña que únicamente intenta conseguir el beneficio de víctimas, como es el pueblo venezolano a través de la mafia bancaria  GoldMan Sachs que fue rescatada en 2009 por Bush Jr. En total, se compraron US $2,800 de bonos de PVDSA (compañía petrolera estatal, expropiada en 1976) pagando solo US $865, lo cual demuestra que es la operación de compra de bonos más rentable de la historia para un banco de inversión probando la capacidad de pago en su vencimiento 2022, país hundido en la miseria a día de hoy. Si el gobierno socialista de Venezuela es suprimido en ese intervalo, los nuevos administradores de Venezuela van a tener que hacer cruces para poder pagar semejante deuda, más la ya acumulada por otras razones de impericia e incapacidad para gobernar, latrocinio al pueblo a través de toda clase de recursos del aparato del poder y cambiar las leyes del Estado para erigir una dictadura encubierta pero claramente manifiesta.  


Por todo ello, caminemos hacia un mundo sin bancas centrales y donde el dinero no lo hagan los bancos sino los propios Estados, erradicando los sistemas socialistas de apropiación indebida de las verdaderas empresas. Como ya se ha explicado, un banco, lo único que crea es deuda, miseria, y bienestar para unos pocos, que gozan de un poder omnímodo, que como se ve, supera a gobiernos como EEUU.

La solución a este colapso financiero es la expropiación de cada Estado de la Tierra de los diablos tenedores del dinero de cada nación. Los Estados deben, no solo controlar la política monetaria, sino todo el dinero emitido en cada Estado. Para eso los bancos privados deben desaparecer mediante expropiación y desmontar la banca central. Los bancos privados son una desviación catastrófica del capitalismo productivo que solo puede generar una catástrofe a futuro.

La mafia debe erradicarse, PRONTO.





Los bancos son rentables, lo dicen sus presidentes, hasta que caen y desaparecen... pero llevándose la talega con ellos.

El dinero en el futuro será realizado por el Estado y las bancas centrales serán anécdotas de unos megalómanos que pretendían dominar el mundo con un no sé qué "Nuevo Orden Mundial" totalitario para todos, excepto para ellos.

Los Rossi's están que lo tiran todo por la ventana... Todos los bancos están en la ruina, pero vamos tirando para adelante... ¿hasta cuándo?




Ayer y hoy del Banco Popular, ¡quién te ha visto y quién te ve!




miércoles, 3 de mayo de 2017

Marine Le Pen tiene que ganar y ganará





22/02/2017 Redacción Destacados, Internacional 7


Marine Le Pen paseando por Beirut.





Marine Le Pen paseando por Beirut.

Enrique de Diego.

Apostamos en Rambla Libre por el Brexit, cuando nadie lo hizo y a todo el mundo le pilló por sorpresa, porque los ingleses no se iban a suicidar. Apostamos, desde el inicio, que ganaría Donald Trump, cuanto todos los demás decían que arrasaría Hillary, porque los norteamericanos no se iban a suicidar. Y ahora apostamos porque Marine Le Pen tiene que ganar y ganará, porque Francia se juega el ser o no ser como nación y como sociedad.

Marine Le Pen ha demostrado de qué pasta de coraje está hecha negándose a ponerse el velo de la sumisión en su visita al Líbano, ese velo al que se han sometido las nefandas feministas del gobierno sueco o con el que la presidenta del Congreso pareció la bruja piruja.

Apuesto sobre seguro. En las encuestas, trucadas por el sistema, Marine Le Pen no hace más que despegarse, mientras las liebres que lanza el sistema se paran y se desinflan. Primero fue Fillon. Luego, Macron, ese candidato de diseño de la asquerosa corrección política, presuntamente bisexual, para no ofender a nadie salvo a Francia a la que se ha apresurado a vilipendiar en la TV argelina, mostrándose como el hombre de Soros para islamizar Francia. El candidato de los degenerados y los antipatriotas, esos que tienden a esconderse tras la nauseabunda patraña del centro.

En muchos barrios de Francia, Francia no existe. Bobigny no es Francia, es una mezcla de Argelia y Nigeria que va camino de degenerar en Siria. Y frente a ese hundimiento de la nación la única solución es Marine Le Pen, y mucho más lejos el oportunista Fillon, que nada hizo cuando pudo, salvo estar con Sarkozy en el ataque a Libia y el asesinato de Gadafi, para entregar Libia a los integristas y a la guerra endémica. Francia y Europa tienen un problema: la Unión Europea, con su supranacionalidad mundialista e islamizadora. Con todo el respeto que siento por el patriota Donald Trump, da la impresión de que Europa le importa poco y el viaje de su vicepresidente tranquilizando a esa casta degenerada de Bruselas que nos está hundiendo en el abismo de la guerra civil interna resulta desalentador. Porque nos están llevando hacia una guerra étnica y religiosa, con la bobada esa del multiculturalismo y el no hay fronteras y todos a vivir del cuento y a difundir el odio, porque estos globalistas no hacen más que difundir el odio contra nosotros, contra los que financiamos a la fuerza la invasión violenta.

Así que en Francia y en Marine Le Pen están la esperanza y la solución. Y desde aquí llamo a los miles de seguidores de Rambla Libre franceses a movilizarse el máximo posible. Nunca pensé que llegaría a desear ser francés, durante unas horas, para poder votar a Marine Le Pen.

Porque los españoles también nos jugamos mucho, con esta dictadura pacata de este Gobierno amorfo, que no es capaz ni de defender la frontera de Ceuta, y estos cuatro partidos de mierda que son uno solo, la tiranía perfecta, que nos han arruinado, que no tienen dinero para las pensiones, pero quieren traer más musulmanes y más subsaharianos a terminar de hundirnos y a crear problemas.

La Francia de Carlomagno y de Roland, de Santa Juana de Arco, de San Bernardo de Claraval, de Cluny, la Saint Chapelle y Nôtre Dame, de San Luis, de Francisco I, de Luis XIV, de Richelieu, de los vendeanos, los girondinos y los jacobinos, la de Molière, Chateaubriand, Tocqueville, Víctor Hugo, Balzac, Dumas, Daudet, Bernanos, Renan, de Maurras y Blum, la de Charles De Gaulle y André Malraux no merece perecer –para convertirse en una colonia de Argelia o en territorio del sanguinario califato- y no lo hará. Esa es la Francia que resurge en Marine Le Pen.







lunes, 1 de mayo de 2017

La estafa de los bancos centrales

No todos saben acerca de la estafa de los bancos centrales que han desmoronado la economía productiva gracias a banskters depredadores que vienen acechando a la humanidad desde que a los orfebres se les ocurrió sacar más vales en depósito que el oro almacenado en sus cajas fuertes...

En resumen, un banco central es una corporación privada que vela por los intereses de los propietarios bancarios de las acciones de los bancos asociados y que, de ninguna forma cuidan por el bienestar de la nación. Por eso, los plutócratas financieros se autodenominan antinacionalistas, globalistas y, en definitiva, son enemigos de la humanidad, pues tienden a realizar operaciones a través del instrumento del tipo de interés del banco central para llevar a la economía al colapso y así proceder a embargar, expoliar y empobrecer a los trabajadores y empresarios, a la población en general usurpándoles el valor real de los bienes en préstamo y empujando a la economía al desastre que a ellos, particularmente, benefician. EL ÚNICO OBJETIVO DE UN BANCO CENTRAL ES EL BENEFICIO DE SUS DUEÑOS BANCARIOS Y DE LOS POLÍTICOS CORRUPTOS QUE AMAMANTAN, A COSTA, SI ES PRECISO, DE LA DESTRUCCIÓN DE LOS ESTADOS EN LOS QUE ESTÁN IMPLANTADOS.

Despertar de esta cruda realidad es bien simple: informarse y estar alertas por si pudiera ser posible unirnos para combatir con este malvado y perverso sistema que, de capitalista no tiene nada, pues más bien es una maquinación soviética de dominación a través de organismos manipuladores como son los bancos centrales en general, el FMI, el BCE y toda la artillería pesada de destrucción masiva contra los ciudadanos y empresarios de bien a través de la deuda y la opacidad rastrera de estos ladrones de la verdadera esencia del capitalismo, como es producir bienes y servicios, no deuda que asfixia a los estados y corrompe al más honorable de los políticos, pues en caso contrario, son amenazados con muerte, como ya ocurrió demasiadas veces en el siglo XIX en EEUU, y el último en fenecer fue John F. Kennedy en 1963.






EEUU contra los banskters...



¡Muera el Nuevo "Orden" Mundial!

Un avance importante en el sistema bancario sería la nacionalización de la creación del dinero por parte del Estado, pues de esa manera, si se encargase la política monetaria a tecnócratas al servicio del pueblo, se acabaría con una mafia mundial que intenta dominarnos con crisis periódicas pactadas bajo sus intereses a través de los mecanismos oscurantistas de la banca central. La mejor garantía del dinero es la del Estado, generando la cantidad necesaria y controlando los depósitos y las inversiones. Para ello, una legislación impoluta, una nueva generación de políticos donde se creen las condiciones para evitar la corrupción y una democracia real que no se parezca a la corruptocracia actual, sería la puntilla final para desmontar a los banskters que intentan destruir a la humanidad a costa de su codicia desmedida.

Si el Estado manejara los bancos sin interferencias de políticos manirrotos de acuerdo a ley, sería un sistema mucho mejor que el de banqueros internacionales que solo quieren obtener mayores ganancias a costa de arruinar al pueblo.

Rockefellers, Morgans, Rothschilds, Warburgs, Soros... dedicaos a la producción industrial, pues es vuestra responsabilidad haber desertizado el mundo reorientándoos a prácticas mafiosas de depredación financiera en la que habéis colapsado la economía. El Estado debería expropiaros de vuestros bancos y no volver nunca a permitir la banca privada. Es la única forma de inmunizar al mundo de locos peligrosos con delirios de dominación megalomaniática. Vuestra deuda bancaria es la miseria de la mayoría y la destrucción del capitalismo productivo, de la economía real.

Muchas acciones financieras que se realizan hoy en día deberían ser prohibidas por los diferentes estados... si hubiera LEY.

No podrán con nosotros por muchas guerras que quieran hacer para diezmar a la población, inventando excusas como la guerra de Irak, el derrocamiento de Gadafi o el hostigamiento de Bashar al-Ásad, por poner varios ejemplos. No buscaban establecer democracias sino sus bancas centrales. Lo que ocurre en África no le importa a nadie, pues en la mayoría de países no existe ni petróleo ni gas, solo hambre y miseria. Por eso ahí no meten las garzas, los "gamberros" centrales a través de su país títere, EEUU. No luchan contra el terrorismo, luchan para seguir implementando sus maléficas bancas centrales. 

Sus planes siniestros hace tiempo que han sido desenmascarados. Los diablos de este mundo, ya los conocemos. Ahora solo hace falta defendernos como podamos. Y Rusia y China pueden hacer mucho daño a esta mafia si juntan sus esfuerzos por hacer una moneda común que desbanque a los organismos de opresión de mafias que buscan guerras en el mundo a los que no piensan como ellos. El Nuevo Orden Mundial no será llevado a cabo pues significa el nazitotalitarismo en manos de unos pocos.


Lucharemos y venceremos. 

Es nuestro destino por el bien de la humanidad.



miércoles, 26 de abril de 2017

Jacob Rothschild is Guilty for the Conspiracy Against Humankind

Veterans Today












GPD is our General Posting Department whereby we share posts from other sources along with general information with our readers. It is managed by our Editorial Board

View Latest Posts >>>





Jacob Rothschild is Guilty for the Conspiracy Against Humankind


jacob
By Aleksandar Sarovic for Veterans Today
Many people do not believe that conspiracy exists. My interest in conspiracies arose when I found out that they exist in the case of the destruction of my homeland Yugoslavia. World media presented the destruction of Yugoslavia as an internal conflict amongst the Yugoslav people; this depiction was just a facade. The essence of the breakup of Yugoslavia was rooted in the colonization of the country. In 1990, the western republics, Slovenia and Croatia, elected parties that supported capitalism. Previously ruling communists won the Serbian election. As a result, Serbia impeded on the pro-Western reforms in Yugoslavia. I realized that the Western politicians and media supported the pro-Western republics and accused the Serbs for all of the problems Yugoslavia entered. This bias was the result of a conspiracy that aimed to alienate people and weaken them politically and economically, which is exactly what happened. The conspirators got power over the whole territory of the former Yugoslavia and cheaply took resources that were built by all the people of Yugoslavia.
People realize that injustice happens around the world. Many media accuse the corporations that rule the world and produce injustice but they do not blame the people who rule the corporations. In that way the media accept that nothing can be done against these rulers. Conspirators like such media because they spread general apathy in society. I have recognized that the allegations against corporations are useless and that it is necessary to find people who benefit from the ruling of the corporations in order to be able to stop them.
Ten years ago I wondered, who might have such great power that they could destroy Yugoslavia? Through investigation, I came to the conclusion that all roads lead to the Rothschild family, although they are very unexposed. The Rothschild family secretly governs the Western world, and so no one could hold them responsible for it. No one could remove them from power. Is that not the goal of conspiracy? At that time, I noticed that many religious people believed that doomsday is approaching and speculated on the identity of the Antichrist. They suspected George Soros, Prince Charles, and even the Pope. I tried to take advantage of the interest of Christians and suggested in the article “Has the Antichrist Come?”, written in 2003, that Jacob Rothschild could be the Antichrist.
By the nineteenth century, the Rothschild family had already become the richest family in the world. Lord Byron presented the family in his poem “Don Juan,” canto 12/5, written in the old year of 1823.
Who hold the balance of the World? Who reign
O’er congress, whether royalist or liberal?
Who rouse the shirtless patriots of Spain?
(That make old Europe’s journals “squeak and gibber” all)
Who keep the World, both old and new, in pain
Or pleasure? Who make politics run glibber all?
The shade of Buonaparte’s noble daring?–
Jew Rothschild, and his fellow-Christian, Baring.

Then began the industrial revolution and the blossoming of colonialism where the Rothschilds certainly became even richer; but then they withdrew from the public arena. Why did they do this? After conquering the Western world, as expected, they wanted to conquer the whole world. Taking into account that rulers were often unpopular, and for this they could even pay with their heads, the Rothschilds have decided to conquer the world secretly. And they have succeeded. Today, they barely place on the list of the richest men in the world. One could get the impression that they lost wealth in the last two hundred years but there is no supporting evidence. On the contrary, I believe that the Rothschilds have never been richer or more powerful than today.
How can the Rothschilds increase their wealth and influence in the world while decreasing their visibility? The Rothschilds, as the richest people in the world, have cleverly come to idea to make contracts with poor agents who then represent them in the ownership of companies. As a reward, these people usually receive about 15% ownership as a gift, in order to incentivize their work, while the rest belongs to the Rothschilds. These people were immediately able to buy mansions, yachts and planes. They are very grateful for it, loyal to the Rothschilds, and do their best not to disappoint them. Such contracts are mutually very beneficial.
An example: After the arrest of Mikhail Khodorkovsky for tax evasion in the oil company “Yukos” in Russia, there appeared a risk that his stocks would be seized. Control over Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s shares of “Yukos” were transferred to Lord Jacob Rothschild. Source is the article from “The Washington Times”, November 2, 2003: “Arrested oil tycoon passed shares to banker”. Oddly, the article cannot be found in the archives of the publishing house any more but fortunately, a copy of the article is available on the web page Action Report Online”. The significance of this article lies in the fact that it shows Jacob Rothschild as a real majority owner of the company “Yukos”. In this case, greed has forced Jacob Rothschild to act erroneously because for the first time, it was uncovered that he hides his own wealth behind other people and, most interestingly, he uncovered it on his own. It should be added that the value of these shares exceeds the entire wealth of the whole Rothschild family, according to Forbes. This means that the wealth and power of the Rothschild family is presented falsely. Why?
Can we assume that the Rothschild model of hiding their wealth behind Khodorkovsky was applied to the other families throughout history? Of course we can. The Rothschilds were the richest people in the world long before the wealthy families Rockefeller, Morgan, Buffet, and others appeared. The Rothschilds have most likely sponsored the rise of these families in a similar fashion toKhodorkovsky. The Banking Monopoly  states: “During WWI, JP Morgan was thought to be the richest man in the US, but after his death it was discovered that he was only a lieutenant of the Rothschild’s. Once Morgan’s will was made public, it was discovered that he owned only 19% of JP Morgan companies “. David Icke writes in Children of the Matrix, that the Rockefellers and Morgans were just “gofers” for the European Rothschilds. Political Vel Craft argues: “Warren Buffett Is Rothschild’s Front Man In The United States.” None of these articles provides evidence that the Rothschilds contracted Rockefeller, Morgan, Buffet, and others to represent them in the ownership and management of the world’s biggest companies because the contracts that regulate their relationship are secret and as such are inaccessible to the public. But the articles provide beyond a reasonable doubt that something like that is more than possible. In this way, the Rothschild familymost likely controls the largest banks, the most profitable companies and the most influential media. They are united in a single hierarchical organization that has predominant financial power, which brings them political power and controls all power centers in the Western world. In such a manner, the Rothschilds most likely manage the Western world, although they are not in politics nor on the lists of the world’s richest.
If there were two centers of such power, then they would have fought for dominance and through their strife we would know who they are, but there is no such thing. The absence of such conflicts tells me with complete certainty that the Rothschild family has monopoly power in the Western world. Therefore, we can hold the Rothschilds accountable for almost everything in the western world. This article will do that to a large extent.

Jacob Rothschild hides his power so much that he does not hesitate to use any means to present himself as a humble philanthropist. An insinuation: A photo of Jacob Rothschild taken by mistake in his home, Waddesdon Manor in England, with the “richest” man in the world, Warren Buffett, and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, has recognized Jacob Rothschild as a very influential man. That is most likely why Jacob Rothschild decided to present Warren Buffett as a great philanthropist and himself as a man surrounded by such people. I think that Jacob Rothschild was behind Warren Buffett’s statement that he intends to donate 85% of his wealth to charity. Of course in this case, this wealth belongs to Jacob Rothschild. The source: Reuters.
Recently, David Rockefeller decided to sell 37% of his Wealth Advisory and Asset Management Group to Jacob Rothschild for an undisclosed sum. Source: Financial Services. It’s no surprise they cooperate well, but this is not the problem here. When people buy something they usually need to pay taxes. According to the law, there are some exceptions and buying corporations is one of them. In this particular case even issuing a bill is not necessary. Why is the law so convenient to those who purchase corporations?
The Rothschilds have such a huge financial power that they could easily redeem all the worth of the stock exchange. In addition, they offer investments to independent companies that the companies could hardly refuse. If the owners of the companies accept the terms of the investment, they may even retain control of their companies. It is critical for the Rothschilds that they are cooperative. If these companies oppose the Rothschilds they run into problems. A huge campaign comes to mind that was supposed to split Microsoft in two because of the allegedly unacceptable monopoly that the company had in the world. The majority owner Bill Gates started playing bridge with Warren Buffet on which occasion Buffet probably explained to Gates the importance of “cooperativeness” in the Western world. I believe that Bill Gates accepted and since then there was no pressure to split Microsoft any more.
The same happens with entire countries. Saudi Arabia has been cooperative with the Rothschilds and therefore nobody touches it. The Rothschilds do not care what oil company exploits oil in the world as long as it belongs to them. If it does not, then the people who control the oil lose their power or even their lives like Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. I do not claim that the Rothschilds have organized the killing of those people. No, their deaths were a side product of the Rothschild’s need to control oil in the world. I do not claim either that the Rothschilds wanted to steal the oil. It will still belong to Iraq and Libya. But the Rothschilds will bring to power obedient people contrary to Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein. Thus, the Rothschilds will establish control over these countries and then of course over their oil. No one else has such power. The Rothschilds are able to achieve this goal because they are invisible and cannot be held accountable.

One of the most important agents of the Rothschild family is George Soros. By portraying himself as a “great benefactor”, he helped the reforms in Eastern Europe and donated to these countries one billion dollars through his organization “Open Society”. The name he gave his organization is at least shamelessly hypocritical because he is one of the prominent members of the most closed society. He is a pirate who wounded many countries and peoples as a result of his greed. William Engdahl wrote about it in his article: The Secret Financial Network Behind “Wizard” George Soros. The article also presents Soros’ connection with the Rothschilds.
Can you who do not believe in conspiracies explain why Soros has donated one billion dollars? Here is my explanation. It was not a gift but a big scam by which the agents of the Rothschild family’s secret organization took the properties of Eastern European countries. I have no evidence. But if you think that the pirate Soros donated one billion dollars to the countries of Eastern Europe to let independent people get rich, then the Rothschild’s conspiracy has successfully formed the way you think. By giving donations to Eastern Europe, Soros promoted capitalism as an ideal systemfinanced parties and media, and corrupted politicians. That allowed other agents of the Rothschild’s to step in in organized manner  and buy the state ownerships in these countries. That is how an investment of one billion dollars returned trillions. This is the only proper way to interpret Soros’ philanthropy. It was organized crime. Some local people in these countries got rich as well, but they are agents who run the Rothschild companies and generally work for commissions.
The governments of East European countries received assistance from representatives of the West, binding them to follow the policy of Western countries. If some government of the East European countries opposes the policies imposed from the West then that country experiences rebellion against the government. The President of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovich was dismissed by violent revolution because he tried to build a closer relationship with Russia. This was a very complex operation that funded the revolution in Ukraine, which has misguided the world about occurrences in Ukraine by controlled media, which has forced the leaders of the world to support a violent change of government in Ukraine. Who could have an interest and the power to achieve it? Only the Rothschilds.
Russia opposes the aggressive policy of the West and therefore the West  increasingly attacks it. I believe that this is the beginning of the third major aggression against Russia after Napoleon and Hitler. I do not think it would be an armed war between America and Russia because both sides know they cannot win. The battles will be performed by economic and political exhaustion and will last until one of the parties gives up. The Russians defeated Napoleon and Hitler, and I believe they might defeat Rothschild as well, primarily because they are moral contrary to the corrupt West and therefore stronger. It would take years, if not decades, of exhausting struggle, during which the countries will stagnate and people will suffer.

The Rothschild family decides for whom people vote in the elections in the US and in all influenced countries around the world by investing large amounts of money to political parties that are most suitable to them and by promoting them through the media they control. In the end, it does not matter to them who will win because they finance, through their agents, all influential parties that follow their interests around the world. Thus they ensure that the policy that suits them would be accepted wherever liberal democracy exists. In the previous presidential elections in the US in 2012, both the dominant parties have spent around a billion dollars. There were more candidates for the presidential position but the Americans did not even know they exist. Where is the democracy? This is a hidden dictatorship of the Rothschild family.
It very rarely happens that things do not work out as the Rothschilds predict. But it does happen. On the way of conquering the world, the Rothschilds met resistance from the Serbs. Serbs resisted the Rothschild family in the attack on Yugoslavia for ten years. The Rothschilds lost patience and decided to break the resistance by way of military aggression of NATO pact on Yugoslavia. Only the Rothschilds can organize an aggression against a sovereign country without consequences because no one can connect them to this aggression. Only Rothschild can mobilize all the western media to justify this aggression through lies. This has backed the support of the world nations for aggression against Yugoslavia. Only Rothschild can benefit from it.
US President Bill Clinton, as the highest authority of NATO, was supposed to command the aggression against Yugoslavia. He knew that such a command would be criminal because it did not have permission from the UN. Therefore, Clinton persistently refused to issue such a command even though the Rothschilds pressured him for years. Then the Rothschild agents set up the Lewinsky case and blackmailed him with impeachment if he refused the aggression against Yugoslavia. Only the Rothschilds can blackmail the US President in such a manner. President Clinton of course preferred his position more than the lives of thousands of people and  commanded the attack on Yugoslavia. Immediately after his approval, the Lewinsky case was completely forgotten. Please see the chronology at CNN. But it’s not all. Clinton got a 500 million dollar donation to build his library in Little Rock, Arkansas. May it be the reward for the attack on Yugoslavia? I wrote excessively about the war in Yugoslavia in the article “My debt to Yugoslavia.” I am deeply convinced that an investigation against US President Bill Clinton for the criminal aggression on Yugoslavia would lead to Jacob Rothschild. But who can sue President Clinton?

The successful aggression on Yugoslavia encouraged the Rothschilds to go further in conquering the world. Thus, in turn came Iraq and Afghanistan, countries rich with minerals. These states were independent and that is something the Rothschild family certainly wanted to change. To make it easier to accomplish they chose George W. Bush for the US President because he was completely on their side as opposed to President Clinton. For the aggression on Afghanistan and Iraq they needed the support of the people. It was found in the terrorist attack in New York on 9/11/2001. I think the Rothschilds would wait way too long for such an opportunity so that I believe they made it happened much sooner by the help from their Muslim allies which the terrorists did not know about. There is an open suspicion that Saudi Arabia had their fingers in it. President Bush immediately accused Afghanistan and Iraq for the terrorist attack even though he had no proof. He gave the ultimatum toAfghanistan and Iraq which they could not accept and ordered the aggression against these countries.
Practically only the Rothschilds can control the American government, only they could benefit from the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, only they are able to launch the aggression, and only they could establish a puppet government there. Only they could have profited from these wars. In order to hide their responsibility if something went wrong, they cunningly sought reserve culprits for the wars. They could not find anyone else but the US government itself. Therefore they formed the conspiracy theory that claims the Bush administration carried out the attack on the twin towers in New York 9/11/2001 in order to obtain a pretext for attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan. This is nonsense. President Bush did not have the operational ability to derive a significant personal benefit from theaggression on Iraq and Afghanistan. I am sure President Bush did not know about that because he was surprised and reacted very awkwardly when he heard that the planes hit the World Trade Center.
But numerous experts who claim that building number 7 was demolished with explosives were found and they accused the US government. This conspiracy theory is presented a lot in the media which would not be possible without the support of the Rothschild family that controls the media. I am an architect and I know that the steel structure is very sensitive to high temperatures and rapidly loses its loading weight capacity when it is exposed to fire, as opposed to concrete structures. Building number seven was burning on low floors almost all day collapsing under the heavy load of the building, which looks like a demolition. The same thing happened to the twin skyscrapers. With such conspiracies the Rothschilds deceive people. The accusation against the US government does not bother the Rothschilds at all, because it serves to carry the burden of all the evil that the Rothschilds commit. Some indication exists which presents the possibility that the Rothschilds bypassed the president, helped the terrorists in the United States achieve their goal, and obstructed the investigation to bring additional suspicion to the US government. Thus they remove any possible doubt from themselves.
The Rothschilds support false conspiracy theories because they invalidate the credibility of real conspiracies. Many people write about the evil Rothschilds even though often they do not have evidence. The Rothschilds have never sued any such writers because such trials would have brought negative attention. Instead of it, they clean themselves from all the evil they cause by beingcrafty. You may not believe it but they alone accuse themselves of the stupid conspiracies. Yes they are doing it. Example: Before it‘s News recently published: “Rothschild Takes Down Malaysian Airliner MH370 to gain rights to the Semiconductor Patent – Getting Rid of Those Who Stood In His Way!” What a stupidity! It is equally absurd as if they are accused of stealing food from a grocery store. The authors of such texts should be afraid the Rothschilds might sue them for slander. Of course unless the Rothschild’s agents hired them to write such articles. Such articles can bringbenefits to the Rothschilds because by it’s shallowness devaluate the real accusations. Unconvincing conspiracy theories create the opposite effect, so that people dismiss conspiracy theories as impossible in today’s “democratic society”. And that is a part of the Rothschild’s conspiracy as well. With such articles, the Rothschilds  become innocent people who suffer unjust accusations in the eyes of the world. Therefore the Rothschild themselves help distribute such articles.  Media today deliberately indoctrinate people by imposing misinformation and shallow values, because misinformed and stupid people are obedient and cannot resist.
On the other hand, nobody investigates the real conspiracy. In the TV broadcast, Democracy Now on 3.2.2007, the U.S. General Wesley Clark said that immediately after 9/11, the Pentagon planned attacks on Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. Is not that enough proof that there is a conspiracy? Clark is a true whistleblower because he unadvisedly betrayed the criminal action by the U.S. authorities. The U.S. Army General’s statement has not awakened any interest in the U.S. judiciary or the media. On the other hand I am not sure if whistleblowers Assange and Snowden have said anything that is not known, but still they are persecuted by the American justice system. Why? Because the U.S. justice and the media are controlled by the Rothschild family. The media have a purpose to remove public interest from the real issues by imposing endless useless public discussions. Assange and Snowden are victims created exactly for that purpose. If what they have revealed did not fit to big capital, you would not know that they exist.
To return to the US aggression on Iraq and Afghanistan; if you physically attack a man you will most likely end up in jail; if you attack Iraq and Afghanistan, kill hundreds of thousands of people to steal their resources, nothing will happen. It cannot be like this. Given that I am very well versed with the aggression against Yugoslavia, I recognized in the criminal aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan the handwriting of the Rothschild family.  Have you ever asked yourself why the President of the US may be impeached for cheating on his wife but cannot be impeached for the criminal aggression against Iraq? I am deeply convinced that the investigation against US President George W Bush for the criminal aggression on Iraq would lead to Jacob Rothschild. But who can suePresident George W Bush?

In order to decrease the dissatisfaction of the people in the United States due to bad policies of George W. Bush, the Rothschild family, aided by their agent David Rockefeller, chose the young and intelligent Barack Obama for the US presidential position. I read somewhere that David Rockefeller, agent of the Rothschild family, first congratulated Barack Obama on his victory long before the election. Barack Obama as a humane man, attracted the American left and tried to remove the problems that the right wing Bush administration built in America. But he is not strong enough to succeed in doing so. Just before the nomination for the presidency, Obama graduated Harvard law. People who complete university must be obedient followers of authority otherwise they would not be able to complete their studies. The Rothschilds knew that they could relatively easily manipulate young Obama and that is why they chose him.
The Rothschilds made from an exemplary law student who believes that everyone is innocent until a court proves him guilty, a criminal and murderer. Obama signed an order for the predatory arrest of Osama Bin Laden that resulted in his cruel murder. He spat on his own diploma. Why has he done this? He felt pressure from the media and the U.S. government officials that surrounded him. They are all controlled by the Rothschilds because otherwise they could not be in the position they hold. No one has convinced me that Osama Bin Laden had anything to do with the terrorist actions that are attributed to him. If you noticed, all the media’s gravest charges have been proved only by putting his picture on the television screen. It is possible that the death was the silencing of a man who was wrongly accused and who could tell an uncomfortable truth in court.
America, pressured by the Rothschilds, kills people around the world with the excuse that in this way they fight terrorism, spread democracy and human rights. That is a lie; this is only about the discipline of disobedient countries. Obama sends drones that kill people in Afghanistan daily under the pretext that it prevents terrorism and spreads democracy. This is terrorism. Could you imagine Afghan drones flying over the United States and killing people because America is an undemocratic and terrorist state? The biggest crime of President Barack Obama was the aggression against Libya. I am deeply convinced that the investigation against US President Barack Obama for the criminal aggression on Libya, would lead to Jacob Rothschild. But who can sue President Barack Obama?

On the way to conquering the world, the Rothschilds certainly want to conquer Russia. The newly elected President of the United States Donald Trump, in his election campaign, promised reconciliation with Russia, because cooperation is the best solution for both countries. With such statements he could not gain the support of the Rothschilds. The victory of President Trump shows that the Rothschilds are still not omnipotent.
President Trump during the election campaign announced the crackdown on lobbying by “global elite,” which is synonymous with the Rothschilds. He should launch an investigation against Rothschild based on facts which beyond a reasonable doubt accuse Rothschild for the conspiracy against America and humankind. But the Rothschilds leave no traces behind their covert operations, so that it would be difficult to prove the accusation against them. In addition, it would require President Trump to clash with the corrupt US administration and powerful people who draw benefits from the existing system. It suggests to me that President Trump will not take the risk of opening an investigation against the Rothschilds. This means that nothing significant can be changed.
It can be expected with great certainty that the Rothschilds will pressure President Trump to follow their policies. They will try to bribe him, and if they fail, they will look for Trumps flaws, such as theyfound with Clinton in the Monica Lewinsky case. It will not be difficult to achieve knowing Trump’s peculiar character. Trump has already showed weakness in keeping election promises before entering the White House. So a variant of continuing conflict between Russia and America is more likely than cooperation.
Sometimes leaders lose their lives through violence. Knowing what kind of power the Rothschild family possess, if I were in the position of public attorney I would ask the Rothschild family if theyknow something about the unsolved murders of Presidents John Kennedy, Salvador Allende, Olof Palme, Slobodan Milosevic, and others. For this, of course, there has to exist political will. If it appears, I believe that the Rothschilds would get scared of such an investigation and would stop creating the criminal policies of society. I believe that this would immediately reduce the problems in the world.
Other heads of “developed” Western countries are also either corrupted or incompetent because other people have no access to such positions. The Rothschilds founded the Bilderberg group. It is a private organization that openly recruits and ideologically directs leaders of the Western world. No wonder that the presidents of Great Britain, France, Italy, and Turkey have recently adopted rebels in Syria as legal representatives of the government. This is a crime. These rebels were secretly created and financed by the Rothschild family with the goal to take control over Syria. That is how the Rothschild family replaces disobedient governments of independent countries. Thus gaining control of all the resources of this world that they do not have yet under control. And since they are fully invisible no one can stop them in that.
A few years ago I saw on a YouTube video, which could not be found anymore, that the Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said: “Do not worry we control the U.S. government.” An intelligent man cannot afford such an arrogant statement if the process of the enslavement of American society is not completed. However, Netanyahu did not tell the truth because Israel does not control the U.S. government, but rather the Rothschild family does. The Rothschilds control the US parliament as well through the AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee). If any senator or representative of the people opposes the Rothschilds, they will not be politicians anymore because AIPAC has the power to dismiss disobedient politicians and they know it. The American laws have been created in a way that suits the rich for centuries. No wonder why those who purchase corporations are not required to pay taxes. America is a colony of the Rothschilds. This is indirectlyconfirmed by the National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski. He recently said, “I do not think there is an implicit obligation for the United States to follow like a stupid mule whatever the Israelis do. I think that the United States has the right to have its own national security policy. ” This sentence shows all the weakness of the US administration to the power the Rothschilds possess.
The Rothschilds control the judicial departments of Western countries as well. They have established the International court in Hague to judge the nations that oppose them. So that is why the Serbs are punished. Just recently, the judgments were made by which the Croatian generals Gotovina and Markač and Kosovar politician Hardinaj were declared innocent in the war in Yugoslavia while the Serbian general Tolimir received a life sentence of imprisonment. The civil war in Yugoslavia produced equal evil on all sides. General Tolimir is no more guilty than the other three people. The judgments are crimes of the corrupted court. Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic was killed in Hague. As the court had no evidence against him, the tension of the four-year stressful trial and most likely inadequate medical treatment for his ailing heart killed him. Vojislav Šešelj, president of the Serbian Radical Party, was in jail in the Hague tribunal for ten years without the judgment. That court is a crime itself and a shame for today’s society. Judges from all over the world judge at this court and that means that judges all over the world are corrupt and that there is no justice anywhere.James Bissett, former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia claimed that George Soros, the agent of the Rothschild family, funded the International Court in Hague. This means that the Serbs were tried by the same man who attacked them. It says to me that the family Rothschild has an impact not only on governments around the world but also on the judiciary. The family Rothschild should be charged for the evil they produces but this, of course, is not possible with a corrupt judiciary. Besides, no one knows that he is responsible for it and therefore he produce the evil in the world uninterruptedly.

In short, power corrupts, and as long as there is power over people, there will be corruption. In my book, Humanism, I have proposed the elimination of power of man over a man. This is the only way to build a good future for humankind, but powerful and corrupted people do not accept such a system. Others are so indoctrinated by the system of education and the media that they could not recognize the benefits of the system I have proposed.
The conspiracy has absorbed science as well. Sometime early this year, I watched the video from the conference of “The Institute for New Economic Thinking.” In this video, George Soros has called upon all economic schools, including Marxist, to contribute to finding a way out of the economic crisis. The call is not sincere because if it were, they would analyze the economic ideas I offered to them, but they had no such intention. They do not want to solve the economic crisis because it suits them better than the release from the economy crisis. What’s that all about? The crisis of capitalism is not based on a lack of production, but on the lack of purchasing power of people. If the big businesses cared about bringing the economy out of the crisis, they need only  to find a way for people to earn more. For this reason I wrote the article Let’s Remove Unemployment where I offered shortening working hours proportionally to the unemployment rate. In this way, the ratio of jobs to workers would be equal. That would establish a fair market of work where the salaries of workers and profits of employers would be justly regulated. In such an economy, the owners of companies would have to attract workers by increasing wages. The increased purchasing power of workers would increase the trade of goods and services and that would bring businesses higher profits and would pull capitalism out of the crisis.
But it would also reduce the economic dependence of workers on businesses. That would free workers from fear of their economic future. Workers would no longer be interested in fighting wars for the interests of big business around the world, for example. Big business is not interested in making money because it already has all the money; it has an interest in controlling the people and its best bet is during a crisis. And that is the main reason the economics crises exist. All economic crises, including the U.S. Great Depression, are incurred through financial interest rate manipulation of the Rothschild family. Webster Griffin Tarpley wrote about that. Through economic crisis, the Rothschilds force independent entrepreneurs to bankruptcy and cheaply take their wealth. So Rothschilds wider circle of people depend on their power. Then workers, because of fear for their own future, silently accept unfairly low wages and their own powerlessness. And if they rebel against the injustice that is happening to them, they at best can oust government but that can change nothing. The policy controlled by the big business remains the same
The shortening of working hours proportionally to the unemployment rate should be the first idea to come to the mind of an independent thinker in order to reduce the suffering of workers and improve the economy and society. But such an idea is nowhere to be seen. Why? Because it is forbidden by the conspiracy of the Rothschild family. Such an idea would start a transformation of societytowards a better socio-economic system. That is why such an idea cannot be heard at universities or in media. None of the media, including those on the left, wanted to publish my article “Let’sRemove Unemployment”. Why? Because most of them are controlled by big business and the rest are indoctrinated by imposed knowledge. The indoctrinated people do not believe that such asimple measure can fix society and economy in the first place because they’ve never heard for it. An idea that does not have access to the public cannot be accepted by political parties either. So thecycle of powerlessness never ends.
But why did Soros call the Marxists when he knew that they were the greatest enemies of capitalism? Then I realized that they are not afraid of Marxists. Probably half the professors of sociology in the Western world are Marxists. They openly teach Marxist philosophy in universities, which would not have been possible if Marxism could undermine capitalism in any way. I am deeply convinced that the Rothschilds consciously manipulate the Marxist-oriented professors by putting them on the wrong path. This way, they reduce the possibility of an appearance of a good left-social system that could defeat capitalism. I wrote about it in the article The Failures of Marxism and the Right Path to Socialism and Communism.
This conspiracy has been established a long time ago. Apparently Lenin returned to Russia from exile with suitcases full of money. The reason? Russian Czar Nicholas Romanov angered the Rothschilds with his support of the American government in a conflict with the Bank of England. Besides, the Russian Czar allegedly repaid the debt to the international bankers and did not want to continue to borrow money from them. That was enough for the Rothschilds to finance the revolution. Exactly the same thing is happening to Syria right now. This is possible only because no one can imagine that the Rothschild family is behind all of it. They realize their interests through financing of crimes because no one can connect the crimes with them.
The Rothschilds have imposed a system of education that makes people stupid. I am not exaggerating. Such an education helps them to stay in power and rule over society. How did they do it? They have been supporting mistaken scientists for centuries who develop wrong or insufficiently right knowledge, and by the help from politics which they also control, they have imposed such knowledge to the system of education. Almost all social scientists may belong to such a group including Karl Marx. Sigmund Freud is a supported carrier of unsuccessful theory of psychoanalysis, which is largely rejected. The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was supported in developing a wrong philosophy from the standpoint of creating a good society. Less well-known Bell, Weinberg, and Hammersmith are supported in the development of the theory of homosexuality registered in genetic code. I’ve shown that this theory is wrong in the article “Homosexuality.” These scientists have become authorities mostly by the help of the Rothschilds. University students have been forced to accept the incorrect or not enough correct knowledge of such authorities if they want to pass exams. Intellectuals who have accepted such knowledge became incompetent and could not find an escape from the problems of society. The best students of the wrong or insufficiently correct sciences became the most influential people in society and then spread false knowledge. In this way the Rothschilds have produced helpless and useless sciences. I wrote more about it in the article My Clash with Sciences. Scientists who are deeply indoctrinated with false knowledge cannot improve the world; nor understand or accept progressive ideas. That is the reason the world cannot move forward.
Conspiracy has affected food production as well. In my article “Epilogue“, I wrote that indications exist that the Rothschild family deliberately poisons people with food in order to produce food cheaply and make more profits. Thus also hire medical and pharmaceutical industries more, over which they have control too. Furthermore, health care and pharmaceutical industry are not keen enough to treat people honestly, because healthy people are not spending money on medical treatment. There are indications that the Rothschilds deliberately poison people with food to reduce the Earth’s population. William Engdahl in his book “Seeds of Destruction” states that the expansion of genetically modified crops and food all over the world today, have reached that scope that can and must be proclaimed as “genocide, crimes against humanity.”
The conspiracy of the Rothschild family has reached every pore of today’s society. Only cooperative people, those who follow the interests of big business have access to the media and are in influential positions in society. They are obedient because they are corrupted by their positions in society and by the markedly high living standards that the system gives to them. People believe that these corrupted individuals deserve everything because of their hard work and skills, but this is not true. They are only pawns of the people who actually run society. But that is not all, the Rothschilds control their opposition as well. They corrupt fighters for justice who publicly confront the existing system but do nothing to change it. They took control over the “Occupy” movement. Also they like to support indoctrinated fighters for justice who are unable to make progress. Noam Chomsky, for example,  is an honest fighter for justice, but has his fight helped humankind? Has he offered a solution that might improve the situation around the world? He has not. And so the Rothschilds must love his contribution to the betterment of humankind. While people who might improve society, like me for example, do not have financial support, do not have access to universities, media, or politics, and cannot help. Every day you can see all kinds of published nonsense but my philosophy, that defines the bright future of humanity, has no access anywhere. Everything is based on a deep conspiracy. People who believe media and follow fighters for “justice,” actually work in favor of their own powerlessness.

The conspiracy is completely hidden so that public does not know anything about it. It is possible that only Jacob Rothschild has access to the entire conspiracy. He has far more power than any emperor in the history of humankind, but nobody knows it. I believe that his wife thinks he is just a successful businessman. Even his son Nathaniel until recently did not know how powerful his father was. When he learned that he would inherit his power, he suddenly transformed from an irresponsible adventurer to a very successful “independent” businessman. Of course, a narrow circle of his family were acquainted with the conspiracy, as well as several other family members, including of course, David Rockefeller, who rules in the name of Rothschild over the United States. In the hierarchy below them no one, I repeat no one, I believe not even Soros, knows how powerful Jacob Rothschild really is. That is why the conspiracy remains undiscovered.
So then how have I discovered how powerful Jacob Rothschild is? Around the turn of the millennium I became convinced that the Rothschilds rule the Western world by studying various documents over the Internet. Many documents and the genealogy of the Rothschild family suggests that the London branch manages the whole family. A variety of statements, articles, and documents indicate that Jacob is the head of the London branch. That is how I realized that Jacob Rothschild is the secret ruler of the western world. He suits the role perfectly as a quiet man mostly known for his love of arts and flowers. This image is of course built up so that no one would have thought that he could be the leader of a global conspiracy. I have no solid evidence against Jacob Rothschild because it is impossible to collect it without the help of governments. State governments are corrupted, incompetent, or afraid of the power of corporations so that they have no intention to search for the evidence and accuse Jacob Rothschild. Anyway, by finishing my research, I concluded that there might be only a 0.1% chance that he is not at the head of the conspiracy hierarchy, and a 0% chance that he is not among the top five. He is certainly guilty for the conspiracy against humankind.
The situation in the world is only getting worse and so I have decided to act. It makes no sense to attack presidents, governments and corporations under media accusations of evil in the world because they are only highlighted puppets Jacob Rothschild has managed and protected. This article is not proof against the Rothschilds but it provides sufficient information and explanations that beyond a reasonable doubt can and should invite public prosecutors to launch an investigation against the Rothschilds. But this requires political will which corrupted governments do not have. Therefore, the bad situation in the world does not change. This article has a task to inform people about what is happening in the world and I expect the unsatisfied people to exert political pressure on their governments to launch an investigation against the Rothschilds. Or to choose new governments that will show the courage to initiate such an investigation. Once the Rothschild family is accused of crime it will be stopped. Then the evil in the world will be stopped as well.
Written 20.12.2012
Updated 29.11.2016
AND THE DEVIL IN THIS WORLD IS ROTHSCHILD FAMILY MAINLY.

THE WARS ARE MADE BY ROTHSCHILDS.

THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE ROTHSCHILD'S MAFIA IN WORLD START WITH THE BIG 2008 RECESSION. HUMANKIND DON'T FORGET AND DON'T FORGIVE.